Re: What Setting For Rear Adjustable Koni Shocks
Reply #1 –
Yahoo Message Number: 92343
Hi Bob,
Your coach will weight in at more then our Allure 40'. But I'll share some opinions:)!
-The rear shocks really don't seem to do too much. Reading on this board I recall older posts from owners that had driven for several thousand miles not knowing that their rear shocks, or single shock, was broken (from over extending usually). They said they never detected any change in handling.
-The era of yours, and ours coach, had the Koni Adjustable SP1 generation (Your coach being bigger and heavier could have a different model number then our Allure. Ours was way undersized for the job, and Koni tried to tell then National CC that it was not up the job of controlling the IFS. Even on setting 5, our SP1 would not control the Allure's front end.). Our OEM Koni's were the same exact model I had installed on our F53 18K Chassis, to give you and idea of the target for that model Koni.
-Your newer Koni's should be SP3 (third generation). According to Koni, these are more robust.
If I were setting the SP3 generation Koni Adjustable on rear drive and tag axles, I'd set them at setting 3. Though I doubt you'd feel a difference between 1 to 3 or even 5, as I feel the air bag's handle most of the rear duties.
I did add the Motion Control Unites from Super Steer. Front and rear, and they did help the coaches handling. It 'sets' faster when going thru side to side road/weight shifts, like on S curves.
And, you may have seen earlier posts that I also went with Road Kings all around, but that was because I got a good price, and had the seller picking up the tab for a set of Koni Adjustable as part of our purchase agreement. The SP2 Adjustable were what was available then, and it is where Justin from Koni told me about the upcoming SP3. IMO, the Koni Adjustable SP3 on the rear and tag, on setting 3 , along with the Road Kings on the IFS front, and Motion Control Units rear and front - would be the way to go if I was doing this today without a good size credit helping subsidize the costs.
Good luck, and let us know what you end up with on the settings, and if you can sense/feel the difference.
Smitty
04 Allure 31017
(And Bob, a quick follow up on the Big Cat vs Big Cummins. I did not communicate well on that post and you responded. I do like and respect CAT. No question about that. And I was glad you set the record straight that getting CAT coverage was not a problem (I had based my comment from a few other boards where CAT owners had had CAT service places not too excited to work on their RV's. Must have been isolated cases.). I also did try to point out the false perception of CAT abandoning OTR, and feel that it did provide a bargaining ploy. May have not worked, but never hurts to try. Do not feel it means CAT coaches should be less then Cummins in general. But just as some people try to get a discount on orphan coaches, it is understandable to try and negotiate the lowest purchase price you can - and all is fair in this dance!
My apology to you, and other CAT owners if that post came across as a slam to CAT - sure was not intended...
Best again - Smitty)